Over representation of youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system. An estimated 70 % of justice-involved youth have disabilities, including psychiatric, mental health, sensory, and intellectual disabilities as well as co-occurring disorders. The vast majority of these youth are in contact with the justice system for minor offenses. Often their contact with the system is related to conduct that is a manifestation of an unrecognized disability or an identified disability that is not being appropriately addressed. For many, community services either are not available or are not being coordinating effectively to provide the right supports.
This over-representation of youth with disabilities includes two categories of youth people confined in secure facilities who have not committed any offense. Far too many parents of youth with a serious emotional disturbance (SED) relinquish custody of their children in the desperate hope that the system can provide them with much needed mental health services that the parents cannot afford. In addition, other children and youth with SEDs are placed in secure JJ facilities for weeks or months as their wait for placement in residential treatment facilities.
Secure juvenile justice facilities are not safe places for vulnerable youth with disabilities. Young people with mental health problems or intellectual disabilities often get worse, not better, when confined in secure JJ facilities, and would do better in community-based settings that provide appropriate treatment without jeopardizing community safety. Even short-term confinement in a secure detention facility pending court proceedings places youth in harms way. This includes physical and sexual assaults from other residents and staff; inadequate suicide protocols and precautions; improper use by staff of toxic psychotropic medications to induce compliance rather than for treatment purposes; prolonged, forced physical exercise as punishment; improper use of force (e.g., pepper spray, tasers, restraint chairs) as unauthorized punishment; denials of medically necessary services; and other violation of youth rights.
Early intervention, prevention, and diversion are the key strategies for addressing these problems. NDRN staff provide training, technical assistance, and a forum for information sharing along the entire continuum of advocacy services to protect the rights of children with disabilities.
Letter re JJDPA funding (April 17, 2012)
Protection & Advocacy for Juvenile Justice (PAJJ) The Need for a Federal P&A JJ Program
Addressing the Needs of Youth with Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice system: The Current State of Knowledge (Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center, 2003)
Collateral Consequences of Confinement: Fact Sheet (Campaign for Youth Justice, 2009)
Costs of Confinement: Why Good Juvenile Justice Policies Make Good Fiscal Sense (Justice Policy Institute, 2009)
DERAILED! The Schoolhouse to Jailhouse Track (Advancement Project, 2003)
Education on Lockdown: The Schoolhouse to Jailhouse Track (Advance Project, et al. March 2005)
Less Cost, More Safety: Guiding Lights for Reform in Juvenile Justice (American Youth Policy Forum, 2001)
The Juvenile Justice System [overview]
When Your Child is Behind Bars: A Family Guide to Surviving the Juvenile Justice System (Mental Health America)
Why Juvenile Detention Makes Teens Worse (Time Magazine, 8-07-0-9)
Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General (US Dept. of Health & Human Services, 2001)
Bullying in Schools (audio recording of 2-14-2011 teleconference)